With His love,
Gavriela

~Debi

I would assume that you consider yourself to be a follower of Christ, however do you truly follow his word?

Have you truly, from your heart, forgiven everyone who has wronged you?

Do you refrain from judging other people?

“Forgive us our debts, as we forgive those who are in debt to us.” Matthew 6:12

“Yes, if you forgive others their failings, your heavenly Father will forgive you yours; but if you do not forgive others, your Father will not forgive your failings either.” Matthew 6:14-15

“Do not judge, and you will not be judged; because the judgments you give are the judgments you will get, and the amount you measure out is the amount you will be given. Why do you observe the splinter in your in your brother’s eye and never notice the plank in your own? How dare you say to your brother, ‘let me take the splinter out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own? Hypocrite! Take the plank out of your own eye first, and then you will see clearly enough to take the splinter out of your brother’s eye.” Matthew 7:1-5

“Brood of vipers, how can your speech be good when you are evil? For a man’s words flow out of what fills his heart. A good man draws good things from his store of goodness; a bad man draws bad things from his store of badness. So I tell you this, that for every unfounded word men utter the will answer on Judgment day, since it is by your words you will be acquitted, and by your words condemned.” Matthew 12:34-37

“For I tell you, if your virtue goes no deeper than that of the scribes and the Pharisees, you will never get into the kingdom of heaven. You have learned how it was said to your ancestors: You must kill; and if anyone does kill he must answer for it before the court. But I say to you: anyone who is angry with his brother will answer for it before the court; if a man calls his brother ‘Fool’ he will answer for it before the Sanhedrin; and if a man calls him ‘Renegade’ he will answer for it in hell fire.” Matthew 5:20-22

“So always treat others as you would like them to treat you; that is meaning of the Law and the Prophets.” Matthew 7:12

Some people don’t think Charles is this capable or even intelligent. Some do not believe that he is a Mason even believing that his family shuns the occult when in fact they embrace it. Many people still view Charles as Defender of the Christian Faith, that he is a harmless, gentle, and kind man. At worst they see him as a royal blunder as the distracting and tabloids tell us. In face of the factual life of this man, we have all grossly underestimated his power, influence, and wealth.

The problem with the evidence you put forward here is that it could fit dozens of people. There are quite literally hundreds of famous people who’s names add up to 666 (especially when you juggle it using titles and so on).

for example
Barney the purple Dinosaur can be made to add up to 666, and he is a dinosaur, which is what a dragon would be today, and he is purple, which is very close to crimson.

While it is concievably possible that Prince Charles could be the “anti-christ” the evidence presented isn’t terribly convincing, because the same evidence can, and has fit numerous other people in history who have not been the anti-christ.

When revelation says 666 is the number of man, what it is referring to is that 6 is the number of man. 7 is the number of God, 3 is the trinity, 8 is messiah (etc) 6 represents man both because it is less than God, its not complete on its own, and because man was made on the 6th day.

thus the significance of 666 is the idea that a man is exalted as though he were God.

Further, the beast of Revelation 13 (ie the anti-christ) is almost certainly the same person as the “prince who is to come” of Daniel chapter 9. This prince is identified as a Roman. Thus the beast will almost certainly arise out of Rome somehow, or have some significant connection by which he claims the heretige of Ancient Rome.

We are told in revelation 17 that the beast was, is not, and is coming up out of the abyss, and that he belongs to the seven kings who went before in that chapter. This strongly suggests that either the beast will be, or claim to be a historical leader re-incarnated, or at the very least will claim a strong heretige from one of those ancient kings.

Charles, as of now, is a virtual non-entity in terms of power and politics. Even when he becomes king, his role is pretty much limited to that of a figure head, a public show piece. The beast is described in scripture as primarily a military and political power house. Thus there would have to be significant, and at this point, unforseeable changes in order for prince Charles to fit the bill.

If I had to guess, I’d say, look for a minor noble, probably german, connected to the house of Hapsburg and the old Holy Roman Empire. He will have to be appointed as some sort of chief executive or military official over the newly created European Union Army. He will probably be connected to/backed by a 10 member executive council of some sort which runs the EU.
After the Ezekiel 38-39 prophecy comes to pass, he will make a covenant with Israel giving them a military gaurentee of peace and even aid in overcoming their muslim neighbors.
By this time Europe will have become very anti-muslim as the result of a backlash due to radical islam trying to take over europe (we are seeing the beginnings of this now).

This fellows conterpart in Israel, who will sign the covenant and use the armies of the beast to overcome his enemies, will be the false prophet (and the “King who does according to his will” of Daniel chapter 11:36) In return for the military aid, the false prophet who is ruling Israel, will use his position in the middle east to provide vast financial (probably oil) benefits to the beast. This relationship will culminate in the false prophet setting up an image of the beast in the temple in Jerusalem. The temple will have been rebuilt as a condition of the earlier covenant.

thats my guess of course I could be totally wrong.

PRINCE CHARLES OF WALES 227+237+66+136=666

nun samek yod kaf tsade resh lamed samek mem vav yod lamed samek 50+60+10+20+90+200+30+60+40+6+10+30+60=666

NASICH CHARLES ME WALES 140+380+40+106=666

Remember, every fact is established by two or three witnesses. Revelation 13:18 also says that it is the name/number of a man. The onomastical definition of the name “Charles” is “man”. Like his motto “I am your man”. He is a man, not a computer or political power.

while you are correct on the symbolism of ‘horns’ and ‘crowns’ and possibly on seven heads, your analysis here misses important details laid forth elsewhere in scripture. Noteably Rev. 17. The same beast described in Rev. 13 is described again in Rev 17 and some of the details are explained.

For example, the 10 horns are explained to be 10 kings who will be given power for a short time at the end. They in turn will give their power to the beast. So the horns are not directly describing the power of the beast, but rather ten kings who will give their power to the beast.

The seven heads are said to be both seven hills (in relation to the woman described in Rev 17) and also seven kings or kingdoms which have existed in history (5 were historical, 1 present tense to John’s time, and 1 future tense to John’s time). This tends to indicate that the beast, in addition to an individual man, represents an ongoing system or an ongoing kingdom which has been embodied through out history in specific rulers.

The fact that the beast in Rev 17 is described as “was, is not, and will come up out of the abyss and go to destruction” indicates that the beast is either a man who once lived, or probably more likely, a spirit which drove a man, or men in the past, and will be released (ie the restraint removed) from the abyss at the end.

I had some thoughts on that recently that were new to me, I’m still mulling them over, I’ll have to share them with you sometime and get your opinion.